Résumés are full of "AI-assisted" claims. Very few candidates have actually built production software with Claude Code as their daily driver. For 10+ years we've placed engineers with 70+ businesses — we hire people who use these agentic tools every day ourselves, so we know exactly what real fluency looks like versus a buzzword.
These are the problems teams run into trying to hire this skill themselves.
Every candidate now claims "AI-assisted development" on their résumé.
You can't tell in an interview who actually ships with it daily.
You want the speed of agentic coding without losing code review discipline.
Junior engineers lean on the agent instead of directing it — output looks fast, then breaks.
Nobody in-house has hands-on time to properly vet an agentic workflow.
A bad hire here costs weeks of cleanup, not just a wasted salary.
Fluency isn't a résumé bullet — it's watching someone direct the agent, read every diff and ship clean code faster. That's exactly what we vet for.
If your roadmap depends on shipping faster with AI, this is for you.
You need engineering velocity investors expect, and agentic coding is how you get there.
Leadership wants Claude Code adopted team-wide, but existing engineers are still learning the workflow.
You need one senior engineer who can move like a small team, using Claude Code to multiply their output.
Each hiring risk above maps to how we evaluate. Here's how we fix it.
Candidates run Claude Code live in front of our engineers — you see fluency, not a claim.
Our own engineers use Claude Code daily, so they know exactly what real fluency looks like versus a demo.
We screen out "vibe coders" — every hire treats generated diffs as a draft to test and review, not final output.
We place engineers experienced enough to direct the agent — not ones who just accept whatever it suggests.
We do the deep technical assessment so you just interview a shortlist of proven candidates.
We shortlist from an existing pool of pre-vetted candidates, so you interview in days, not months.
Our own teams build software with Claude Code every day. That means when we assess a candidate, we know the difference between someone who prompts and hopes, and someone who architects, directs and reviews. For 10+ years and 70+ clients, that's the bar we hire to.
Book a Talent Call →The same "AI-fluent" hire, three very different outcomes.
We scope your stack, seniority and start date — no cost, no obligation.
We match vetted Claude Code developers from our pool, ready to interview.
See real agentic fluency live in your interview, not just a résumé claim.
Your hire joins the codebase fast, and we scale as your roadmap shifts.
I've collaborated with a developer for over a year, and their level of service has been nothing short of fantastic.
It's part of our hiring bar. Candidates are assessed on agentic-tool fluency alongside their core stack, and you can watch it live during your interview with them — not just take our word for it.
No. Our developers treat Claude Code as a fast collaborator, not an autopilot — every diff is read, tested and reviewed before it merges. Speed comes from the workflow, not from skipping the discipline.
Our engineers are fluent across the major agentic tools, not locked to one. If your team standardizes on Claude Code, Cursor or Codex, we match someone who already works that way.
We match from an existing vetted pool, so you're typically interviewing within days and can have someone contributing to your codebase shortly after.
Both. Many clients start on contract to prove fit on real work, then convert strong performers to permanent.
Book a talent call — we'll scope the role and match you with a vetted, AI-fluent engineer ready to interview.